Son of His Time

   "No, but what I think you wanted to say is that even despite his pretty talk, he (Paul) was a" child of his time "- to the point of not realizing that their ideas were incoherent.   [Nihil]

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

   " Also I never understood what Paul would lose being an abolitionist!

  Because he did not ask LIBERTY Onesimus to Philemon? "

[So Why Is So]

  All texts have numerous loopholes, let's move this to the Nihil chose.

  My big debate with the Spiritist revolved around Kardec was a "child of his time".

  Kardec's ideas have their time is natural, but the "Spirits" are limited to this is a subversion of logic.

 

  Spirits must be at least technologically very advanced, this just to stay in the field of "materiality."

  Suppose I go back 100 years in time and retain my current knowledge, even being mediocre in 2013 I would be a genius in 1913.

  Even without counting [say]"magical powers" healing or multiplication of food was almost inevitable that I excelled buying up shares of certain companies.

  Once wealthy could develop research with products that I have a good idea of ​​how they work and would be even more rich and powerful.

  Soon, we were in doubt as higher spirits which Kardec claimed to have contact. Instead of being moving tables because not brought to Kardec how to get antibiotics?

  Fleming explained through exhaustive research to develop this product?

º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º

  Oras, move tables [manually] is something possible since they were invented, the Spirits do not trepidarem tables was something useful to mankind; without counting the crap "scientific" presented by them in the book of Genesis psychographic.

  Naturally as a man of science that was, and fully aware of what might be in error, it left open the question, but suggested a second hypothesis, which confirms its sympathy for the theory of spontaneous generation. This is very clear in the statement Kardec the end of this part:

"The theory of spontaneous generation hypothesis is not definitive, but likely, and perhaps one day will take place between the pair acknowledged truths." [Spiritualism comProfundidade]

  You see that the worshipers of Kardec not understand it as a scientist or philosopher could go wrong, but if he really spoke on behalf of Spirits such errors could not occur.

  The ES Kardec occupied the MORALLY scold us like any other religion, but let us stop here with Kardecism us return to Paul.

º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º

  Paul said he was inspired by ES [Holy Spirit, not coincidence?], I have also this news has not brought us any technological advancement, he could have told us for example that mosquitoes transmitted diseases and many "miracle cures" to be expendable.

  The Holy Spirit of God also engaged in MORALLY and even scold us in this regard was not ahead of its time!

  For ES slavery was morally acceptable always, remember also that women be obedient to man and people pay exorbitant taxes was and is always morally acceptable.

  If you question the knowledge brought by the Holy Spirit or the Spirit "superiors" in the field TECNOLOGICO in the field of MORAL have no doubt that they were not beyond the time of Paul or Kardec.

  If Paul was mistaken in basic questions of morality as being opposed to slavery, as we treat our women as equals and not even give the government carte blanche to spend as you wish ...

  Other things about which Paul would tricked inspired by the Holy Spirit of God?

 "Decipher me or I will devour!"

Mathematical Philosophy