%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
In the case of laws there is a thing called mitigating and aggravating.
How imagine that anyone reading this blog has a good level of culture will not go through the maze of letters, no doubt resort to dictionary or Google.
Let's get right to what interests me, my goal is to show you how society Freudian "extenuating sophistry," come with me!
A citizen crosses a red light and hits a person if the deceased person is an aggravating factor, if the lights had malfunction is a mitigating factor, if the driver was drunk is an aggravating factor, it was taking his wife to the hospital in labor is one mitigating ...
That we focus CRIME WAS DONE, citizens ran a red light.
In a process of "individualization of punishment" the judge seeks circumstances that caused the event, search for mitigating and aggravating.
Observed that psychology makes the offense a minor detail, which account for psychology are extenuating!
Champinha killed Liana is a minor detail, the tip of an iceberg, to psychology are born a blank then a boy of 16 who commits a crime just may have some mental problem or have been "spoiled" by society.
So for psychology investigations are focused on mitigating no longer matters Liana's death, we have to find out what led to this poor Champinha act crazy and try to help him.
Liana and Felipe are dead even, "and nothing will bring them back," forget them and socorramos who really need help! [Tragically]
º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º
Judge seeks the individualization of punishment, since the collectivization of psychology sells "healing."
She sells us the fallacy that if we help Champinha solve all cases of people like him, a kind of therapeutic jurisprudence.
The mitigating Champinha are that comes from a very poor family, his father had a stroke, and once Champinha had seizures.
Let's leave aside the dampening of "conditioning" that psychology is so fond, as I have mentioned in other text.
Why, I came from a very poor family, my father was abusing drink and beat my mother, I never had seizures, but one of my sisters had many teenage ...
In fact they can have seizures on many causes, my daughter has had a high fever convulsions, Ronaldo player had seizures, who does not know someone who has had seizures?
Realize that philosophically found no mitigating conclusive?
For the Philosophy Champinha killed Liana and Felipe because HAD WILL FEEL HAPPY TO KILL.
Liana was the daughter of a Ze Alley equal perhaps if I had not taken greater proportions and certainly would be free Champinha[psychologists attest that their behavior is exemplary] Freudian because society does not care about the crime committed and the lives of Liana Felipe are mere details, crash course in life Champinha, this rather a "prodigal son" of society.
Grounded in psychological DOGMA a person under 18 can not be held responsible for their actions, these minors, is worse than the crime, leaving the House Foundation with a clean slate so we can say that Champinha was a blank to complete 18.
It is forbidden by law a civilian investigate crimes such children, or their names may be published, but believe me, you would be horrified at the ability they have to be cruel.
I wish I could post here the numerous photos of the victims of these "little angels", but I know I would have no problems with them, but with the Freudian society.
Rest in peace Liana, Felipe and mostly all victims "devoured by lions" whose case was not famous and remain as just another mere details, missteps in life monsters ...
Evil won again.
How to disarm the sophistry Freudian? I confess I do not know.
Become a tradition people do not question the Psychology and Psychology says that in any offense are the important ATTENUATING.
To me the central point is the CRIME DONE, is once again ... loneliness solid ...
"Champinha" a step in the liberation and clean record. "
Champinha confessed the crimes to the police, said he was the mastermind of the kidnapping and said, unapologetic: 'I killed because I wanted to kill. " [Aggio]
No comments:
Post a Comment