Pitboys and Bambis

   "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The foolish man insists on trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man. "    [Bernard Shaw]%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

I've read several thinkers who defend the thesis that descended from cowards and others who say they are descended from wild and daring, these two lines of reasoning can not resist logic.

  The vast majority of us balancing between shyness and boldness with a greater tendency to shyness.

  Let's imagine the first human contact with the fire for example.

  Philosophy Mathematics suggests that it was probably a ray burning forest or a volcanic eruption.

  A coward would run like a pussy crazy without approaching fire at any time since the audacious behave as a "pitboy" would probably be hit by fire taking unnecessary risks.

  We also have that kind OBSERVER, nor coward nor bold.

  Which of these types would have more chance to control fire?

º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º

  The pitboy is a guy who thinks little, little plans. The observer might even take advantage of their daring using him as cannon fodder, such as laboratory mice.

  The coward would be very weak in developing new technologies, a type easily manipulated and enslaved.

  So I defend the thesis that humans are the most efficient type reasonable / observers.

  Pitboys are good test pilots, guinea pigs and Bambis are easily manipulated, afraid to think for themselves.

  The fittest are this harmony of opposites, Yin and Yang.

  Clearly life is not exact and are born among us pitboys and duiker, but the type and predominant winner is the viewer with varying degrees of fear and daring.

  We all have moments of courage or cowardice, the best adapted can act more "balance".

  Do not confuse balance with success:

  "I told you how much Mozart and Michelangelo were mediocre people, could only read his art and nothing else, people confined to their TALENT, who can say they were not geniuses?

  Life is not exact. The mass is mediocre in the sense of not having an overview of things, but in their "gifts" his "talents", make a difference in society, are not expendable or scum. "  [Gifts and Talents] 

º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º

  Think of a baby, he looks much before acting, know your weaknesses and only feels good if her protective mother is around. As you get to know things will experiencing a greater distance from their parents.

  I remember when my daughters were learning to walk, holding my hand tightly, after some time did not want to hold my hand at all, ran m

im.

  Babies are not totally crazy, plan, prepare, and try to only take risks when they feel safe to do so.

  Because of the stubbornness my daughters took tumbles but unafraid LEARNED TO WALK.

  I miss those pitoquinhos as helpless needing me, but I'm glad that life has run its course and now they walk on their own feet.

  So my friends my friends who are attracted to this kind of reading the blog, you are probably the type that surpassed all others, not so crazy as to be consumed by fire nor cowards who can not get something out of it.

  That the progress of humanity is to be credited to the crazy "I" consider sophistry.

  Our progress is due more to the observers / planners ...the human REASONABLE.

Mathematical Philosophy