"She's talented as hell. But I know so many people who have talent and have no luck ... So I think the guy who thinks being an artist even in're screwed, because few people can do successfully. And there are very few who can make a career for long. Like me, is very rare. " [Martinho da Vila] Click Here
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
In my life I watched the same as Martin, was what made me stop reading self-help books.
No, I'm not talking not to read this kind of literature, I think quite useful to only come to the conclusion that to succeed we need LUCK.
I'm sure if my dad was the early Verissimo I would emplacado good books and today would be a respectable writer, might even live to write, but had no luck or was not "given" I was born the son of someone so influential write somewhat only, I write for myself.
Some text might have fallen in love with someone "important" and I open a door, but it also never happened.
Modesty aside, I've written some anthologies texts, texts to reread the file I think: Blimey what a wonderful thing!
º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º
Example: Sure Paulo Coelho has a talent for writing, but you can not ignore the luck component.
Have a thought of Paulo Coelho that says:
"There is nothing completely wrong with the world, even a stopped clock can be right twice a day" [Paulo Coelho]
Some colleagues have told me how this thinking is BEAUTIFUL.
I say that not for it ceases to be a # of me.
[I do not speak this word in everyday life, it is not part of my vocabulary oral]
I say it is a well-meaning but shallow thinking and all are horrified demanding an explanation or apology.
Alas, the day has 86,400 seconds, rest assured only two measly seconds is below mediocre.
For those who think this beautiful and interesting stool thinking of Paulo Coelho is magnificent. I would not pay a penny stuck by him.
To Paul's readers I would recommend that they work with that staff carrying out examinations of feces. [Now I've got heavy, do not take themselves so seriously is just to "dramatize" a little text]
Of course I understand what Paul meant:
Even that seems totally wrong idea that has anything salvageable.
But face it, my text "About Equations" is much more direct, more objective and lends less sophistry of self-help.
The way Paul wrote is an incentive to hold on to the few situations where we are right leaving in the background those that are disabled.
Paul seems to try to raise self-esteem, but who can feel some appreciation for being most of the time outside of reality, be wrong?
If any leftovers in clear weather we should examine the background to the proposal that co-stoned job, but is more efficient devote most of our time for that coworker who brings more often good ideas, good solutions.
Life is not exact and follow mathematical logic in not guarantee success, but it will bring us EFFICIENCY which is already something fabulous.
And success?
Success depends on LUCK and how to get lucky to have a great mystery.
Here in the Abyss never noticed that efficiency messed up luck, success when this "certain" to happen, happens even with extremely inefficient people, so try to be efficient and GOOD LUCK!
No comments:
Post a Comment