Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Left-wing intellectuals

 


Roberto: Why do intellectuals tend to lean toward the Left?

William: First, let’s ground ourselves in human history.

 "The term 'Right' emerged during the National Constituent Assembly of 1789, during the French Revolution. The division was physical: those who defended royal authority, the aristocracy, and the Church (the Girondins and monarchists) sat to the right of the assembly president. They sought to preserve the traditional order and the power of the clergy and nobility. This seating arrangement gave rise to the political concept of the 'Right' as the conservative or reactionary wing, in opposition to the revolutionaries on the Left." 
 *Gemini*


 "In Marxism, 'Right' generally refers to reformist or revisionist tendencies within the labor movement. These are sectors that seek to reconcile labor with capital, prioritizing gradual changes through parliament rather than abrupt revolution. Internally, the term labels those who stray from revolutionary orthodoxy (like Bukharin’s 'Right Opposition'). For Marx, the Right represents the maintenance of the bourgeois status quo and private property. Marx’s ideas eventually culminated in the Russian Revolution of 1917." 
 *Gemini*

  Therefore, talking about "Right" or "Left" before 1789 is purely subjective. Were Socrates, Plato, Archimedes, or Marcus Aurelius "right-wing" or "left-wing" thinkers?   
  It’s better to analyze their thoughts without getting stuck on those labels.


  Adam Smith’s "The Wealth of Nations" was released in 1776 and is considered the founding milestone of the capitalist economy. 
  However, back then, there was no internet, books were expensive, and there were no planes. Ideas moved slowly. 
  Mercantilism dominated until about 1850. 
  Capitalism as we know it didn't truly take hold until around 1900.

  From 1900 onward, we’ve always had thinkers on both sides. 
  In my view, the Left is more romantic.
   Humans aren't always rational, but they are always emotional.

   I consider myself Center-Right. 
   I argue that if you want a house, you have to work for it and exercise financial discipline. 
  The left-leaning thinker says we can organize ourselves into a State, and you will be given a house.

   Believing we can just "get" a house sounds a lot better than having to work to build one. 
   Right there, the left-wing thinker already wins over the majority.

  Back in the early 1900s, that didn't seem like such an absurd idea. 
  Honestly, I think I would have been a Marxist if I had been born in that era. 
  But I was born well after the middle of the century, and I studied the collapse of the USSR in detail.


  What we observe most often is that "well-intentioned" Socialists, once they reach power, never want to leave. 
  In practice, the nations that chose Socialism essentially reverted to a phase of Absolute Monarchy.
   They just swapped titles like "King," "Pharaoh," or "Emperor" for "Supreme Leader." 

  Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini, Fidel... what is the real difference between them and Kings?


   To answer your initial question: 

"Why do intellectuals tend to be left-wing?"

  From 1900 to 2010, the "romanticism" of the Left proved to be more effective. 
  However, the popularization of the internet and the arrival of smartphones around 2007 brought a flood of information to the average person. 
  The expectation now is that rationality will begin to predominate.

   It’s not about eliminating romanticism altogether. It’s about having a more balanced "emotional intelligence."
   The trend I see is that older left-wing thinkers will eventually pass away, and they aren't being replaced with the same intensity we saw in the past.



✧✧✧

.

Thursday, April 16, 2026

Iran and the War

 


Salin: The things they tell us are "impossible" would actually cost only a fraction of what this war does. 
  As the saying goes: "They have money for war, but they can't feed the poor."

William: If the Iranians understood that, there wouldn't be a war in the first place. 
  Just imagine how much they’ve blown on tunnels and missiles.

Salin: You should take a look at who actually started this (Iran vs. the USA). 
  Don't just look at where the fighting is happening, but which country brought the war there to begin with.

William: Look, I’m not the type to just jump on a bandwagon to justify my opinion. 
  These conflicts shifted to a whole different level once the Iranian Revolution happened. 
  The Ayatollahs being Shia wouldn’t be an issue if they kept it within Iran, but they’ve gone out of their way to export that revolution across the Middle East by funding Hezbollah, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Houthis. 
  The Ayatollahs brought the "war" to the Sunnis and the Israelis. 
  Take Saudi Arabia, for example—it’s a dictatorship, sure, but they mind their own business and live in peace with the West.

Salin: A revolution that was sparked by outside actors, I might add. 
  Before that, the successors of the Persian Empire actually had a democratic and egalitarian government.

William: Outside actors are always playing a hand everywhere. 
  But as far as I know, the American connection with the Shah was no different than their connection with the Saudis. 
  If you want to talk about outside agents, you're probably thinking of the Russians.

Salin: Like I said before, every country in the Middle East is like that. 
  Peace with the Western world isn't "free",it ’s conditional on submitting to foreign interests.   
  As always, it's just business.

William: Iraq invaded Kuwait. 
  If Saddam had just stayed in his lane, he’d still be a dictator today. 
  Iran is heavily intervening in Yemen and Lebanon; they aren't innocent victims in any of this.




✧✧✧

.

Saturday, April 11, 2026

Is Trump Bad!?

 




  Many people say Trump is bad.
  Compared to whom?
  I’d rather be governed by him than by Alexandre de Moraes. 
  (Just one example among many.)

  And what about compared to Putin?
  No one stopped Putin during the invasion of Georgia or Crimea.
  Thank goodness Trump showed up.
  Everything was way too easy for those dictators.

  It’s a good thing Trump has strategic interests in Brazil.
  I hope the mafia currently in power doesn’t commit any abuses now that they’re being watched so closely.
  If it weren't for the Americans, the elections would already be a lost cause.
  If the majority of the people want to stay in such a corrupt environment, fine, whatever, the only way out is the airport.
  The real problem is if the majority wants the PT out and the Supreme Court doesn't let it happen.


✧✧✧

.

Saturday, April 4, 2026

Paulo Freire and Socialism

 



Ailton: Do you realize the reason Paulo Freire is seen as a communist or socialist—and why he’s been hated by the right wing both then and now—is because, back in his day, only people who could read were allowed to vote? 

  At that time, political rights were tied to literacy. Education was extremely elitist, and most people had no access to it. Freire wouldn't stand for that. Being the great educator he was, he developed a method to teach adults to read and write in record time. 

  Suddenly, these adults gained the right to vote. The right wing hated it. They accused Freire of being a communist, and he eventually had to flee the country. He wasn't "playing the victim" or promoting "victimhood"; he believed that everyone deserved political rights, regardless of whether they were rich or poor.



William: I don't know about that. I’ve spent a lot of time studying Paulo Freire’s work and his biography. 

  He OPENLY DECLARED himself a socialist educator and was actually one of the founders of the Workers' Party.

   His "magnum opus," Pedagogy of the Oppressed, is built on the core concepts of historical-dialectical materialism, things like class struggle, praxis, and overcoming the oppressor-oppressed relationship.



✧✧✧

.