Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Sun


"Do not forget that logic is always dictated by someone who has power in general. All indications are that life is a unique existence, the dimensions of space and time in which it occurs. The time is now. Being a good singer depends on your reference, which are the judgments which makes them generally in line with what others think. I mean if you just felt a good singer when the approval of others, then what you want is recognition and not be a good singer. As for drugs, legal or illegal, it also falls into the realm of feelings and motivations. Some people seek help when they understand that they need, which can also be imposition of others, unless in their conduct towards each other, their life together becomes unbearable, which can be resolved if the other sends the addict away, or accepts their condition. This talk will go away. You should mull over your choices, your desires, your conscious action and social events, when in fact it can be instead of supporting actor, might have found the meaning of life, not without suffering, is LOGICAL. "[E-mail ]
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
  The logic is always dictated by someone who has power in general???
  The Earth revolves around the Sun, it is observable, of course, was dictated by God? Is it?
  If all who hear me say I'm not a good singer, but I think that is what I am worth? I'm a good singer because I think I am?
  Nor do I understand why suffering must necessarily be part of the equation. Sinatra did not suffer to sing, can not even admire your tone or style, but to say that he was not a good singer but it does not seem logical.
  Sinatra was a good singer because they had rhythm, pitch, reached comfortably musical notes, there was someone who "has the power" [ground at least] that established it, the music is a science, there is a lot of math to produce a musical instrument.
  Singing everybody sings, until our noble deputy Tiririca was very successful singing. The question that remains is that if we compare it with a Fred Mercury [forget the style] who can keep their COHERENT ARGUMENT that Tiririca is a much better singer or training might be as good as the former rocker?
  So the logic is supported by scientific evidence and in the absence of them in coherent arguments.
  Fred could sing any song off of Tiririca the reciprocal is not true.
  This conversation could go even further, but with solid foundations on a good definition of what is the logic.
  His structuring of thought doing the logic depend on the willingness of someone committed the rest of the text.
  Anyway thanks, if I can be more clear about the logic be defined by the power of one, not of argument or scientific, but by the will, we could move forward on the issue.
  Do not give me the example of simplistic mathematical symbols. I know I could call the second four and that was a convention of people who were in power, but the convention was a logical thing for everyone to understand that the same symbol.
  For British Sol is Sun, Terra is Earth, but for logic Earth revolves around the Sun ...

  This will not change by more than England has power, and even though I did not understand any English ...


No comments:

Post a Comment