"The more knowledge there is something inherent in the greater love ... One who imagines that all fruits ripen at the same time as cherries, knows nothing about grapes." [Paracelsus]
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Well, I know that when the grapes are ripe are devoured.
When I say that love is one of the forces that move humanity is not with this romantic connotation and "positive" as other thinkers. Here in the Abyss concept of good / bad, positive / negative are much more difficult to be identified or defined. Some time ago I wrote an article about it later try to recover it.
For now let's get into this gap proposed by Paracelsus, "the more knowledge more love."
Pimenta Neves is one of those people with culture and knowledge was odd and a killer cold for Sandra Gomide. He knew that more and more loved, loved him so much that he was able to kill, but kills donut?
The hard is what kills, but Paracelsus would say that Pepper did not love the truth and as always happens outside of Mathematical Philosophy people "build a true fact" that justifies its ideology even if it is not observable.
I will not fall into the same trap and say that I know the "real truth" not only observe that love is the force of good that always lead to happy endings or continuations rather happy. [It was beautiful in it?]
Pimenta Neves with his power, prestige and great knowledge could do the same thing as a noble and have a Senator Marcela Temer or another and have a Senator Monica Veloso but put his life at risk by a single woman who was not even there these things.
Paracelsus's friend, there may be some mental illness that justifies its ideology, but for us here the pepper seems pretty healthy, their knowledge helped a lot to not be punished for the crime.
The higher knowledge is a greater love equation that does not close, but this is common in the Abyss where life and love is not accurate is this force beyond good and evil.
My knowledge tells me that love can be very constructive or destructive by far this has an enormous capacity to create "potential difference" and this difference causes MOVEMENT.
Paracelsus would say my knowledge is not the "true knowledge", now if I do not know what is true love how do I know what is true knowledge, how can I say that Pepper did not love Sandra?
My friend Socrates said: "I only know that I know nothing."
Philosophy in Mathematics only ponder if the theory corresponds to an observable reality. If reality will change one day and will bring us a new TRUTH course it's a possibility. The movement is a property of life so comprehensive that even the truth in this movement.
The truth now is that knowledge does not necessarily lead to greater capacity for love that is the observable reality, that the target is always in our best interest to get closer to the truth without giving us the illusion of one day reach her at her fullness, an hour there actually true if one day we will find a paradise that is subject to any religious and their adaptations of reality, inventing worlds.
No comments:
Post a Comment