Social Pain

  "The evil acts do not hurt because they are forbidden, but are prohibited by ache."   [Benjamin Franklin]

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

  There are people who say that the forbidden is tastier.

  In case the person feel happy to take risks may be, but my friend Franklin does not believe that a thing can only get hotter for being banned.

  Let's walk through this gap and talk a bit more about SIN.

  Let's take something forbidden in any society or religion, murder.

  I can not think of anyone that I've wanted to kill, but suppose I had a great dislike, well, kill it would give me great pleasure, do not feel no pain or remorse, however, be prohibited to kill him would be to unpleasant if I were to be imprisoned.

  It turns out that Franklin talks of SOCIAL PAIN, something that does not hurt me can really hurt another or others then comes the ban.

  Misuse of funds does not hurt simply by being banned, so causes me laugh when someone appeals to the conscience of the villain or corrupt politician.

  If the guy had that kind of awareness would not go to the crime and whether the benefit, and is even more difficult to go back.

  A theft or diversion of funds does not hurt because it is forbidden; hurts "socially" because disturbs the lives of many for the benefit of a few, we could not observe JUSTICE.

° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °

  Realize how we approach a good definition of what would be the sin out of religious dogmas?

  Let's delve into this a bit more meditation.

  Robbery, rape, murder, are acts that cause so much pain should be banned, are "sins".

  But let's look at other things considered sin:

  Because sin is a woman walking with her head uncovered?

  Why is sin woman driving a cult or mass?

  Why is sin I attend nude beach?

  I participate because it is sin of gambling?

  Excess of anything can be harmful to my life or my body then sin against myself should be avoided, but if I'm getting pleasure and I'm not harming anyone or myself, do not know why an activity should be prohibited or sinful.

  I think the UFC or boxing a wildness, but never forbid.

  The guy knows the rules, there is bound to fight, "the pleasure of fighting outweighs the pain" ... then fight!

º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º

  Take the case of homosexuality, you can not defend a serious religion such act, would imply that God erred in admitting a person's body.

  Logic also tells us that it makes no sense for a man to feel sexual attraction to another man, then by the law of God through reason and the practice of homosexuality should be banned.

  In the religious field there is nothing to discuss, dogma is dogma and ready, God is perfect and just makes things perfect and ready. If the man himself is deviated and Demo fault.

 The logic allows us to walk a few more places after the comma, so let's nóis!

  In which a gay couple harms society?

  If boxers by mutual agreement decide to wrestle think it is wise of us to accept.

  If two men or two women by mutual agreement decide to live as a couple seems to me that we should follow the logic established for boxing.

  I swear I never encourage my daughter to follow a sport as wild as these free fights.

  If one decides then I regret much, but if a choice of them even have to grudgingly accept, but I confess I would not give the slightest support or would find the least wild boxing only because my daughter joined this sport.

  If homosexuality is a divine sin that God send them to hell, there's nothing you can do about it, we have no power to avoid eternal damnation.

  In the field of logic are good citizens, law-abiding, they are not hurting anyone then it would be a big waste of ENERGIA SOCIAL stay chasing them.

  I'm no prude, if my daughter is a lesbian would declare to be a very sad day, would have no pride of her sexual orientation, not go around bragging to friends. You know I believe in social efficiency to keep up appearances.   Click Here

  A friend asked if I would tell the truth and complain over this unpleasant situation in my life.

  However my daughters would always be welcomed without any falsehood on my part, if this is the pleasure of them and are not doing anyone any harm ...

  The bad acts are not forbidden (sins) because they hurt on us; are banned because they hurt others by our act.

  This logic comes into your mind?

previous